Social Media Use Among Members of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society: Results of a Web-Based Survey.

BACKGROUND: The use of social media in health care may serve as a beneficial tool for education, information dissemination, telemedicine, research, networking, and communications. To better leverage the benefits of social media, it is imperative to understand the patterns of its use and potential barriers to its implementation in health care. A previous study in 2016 that investigated social media use among young clinical rheumatologists (≤45 years) and basic scientists showed that there was substantial social media use among them for social and professional reasons. However, there is a limited inquiry into social media use in different areas of rheumatology, such as spondyloarthritis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the motivations, barriers, and patterns of social media use among an international group of experts in spondyloarthritis. METHODS: We distributed a web-based survey via email from March 2021 to June 2021 to 198 members of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society. It contained 24 questions about demographic characteristics, patterns of current social media use, and perceptions of utility. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the characteristics associated with use trends. RESULTS: The response rate was 78.8% (156/198). Of these, 93.6% (146/156) of participants used at least one social media platform. Apart from internet-based shopping and entertainment, the use of social media for clinical updates (odds ratio [OR] 6.25, 95% CI 2.43-16.03) and research updates (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.35-8.78) were associated with higher social media consumption. Among the respondents, 66% (103/156) used social media in a work-related manner. The use of social media for new web-based resources (OR 6.55, 95% CI 2.01-21.37), interaction with international colleagues (OR 4.66, 95% CI 1.21-17.90), and establishing a web-based presence (OR 4.05, 95% CI 1.25-13.13) were associated with higher levels of consumption for work-related purposes. Time investment, confidentiality concerns, and security concerns were the top 3 challenges to a wider adoption of social media. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents (103/156, 66%) use social media in a work-related manner. Professional development, establishing a web-based presence, and international collaboration were associated with higher use. Challenges to social media adoption should be addressed to maximize its benefits.

An Adaptable Framework for Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence: Results from a Systematic Review of 102 Conceptual Frameworks.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available conceptual models for factors contributing to medication adherence based on the World Health Organization (WHO)'s five dimensions of medication adherence via a systematic review, identify the patient groups described in available conceptual models, and present an adaptable conceptual model that describes the factors contributing to medication adherence in the identified patient groups. METHODS: We searched PubMed®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® for English language articles published from inception until 31 March 2020. Full-text original publications in English that presented theoretical or conceptual models for factors contributing to medication adherence were included. Studies that presented statistical models were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data. RESULTS: We identified 102 conceptual models, and classified the factors contributing to medication adherence using the WHO's five dimensions of medication adherence, namely patient-related, medication-related, condition-related, healthcare system/healthcare provider-related, and socioeconomic factors. Eight patient groups were identified based on age and disease condition. The most universally addressed factors were patient-related factors. Medication-related, condition-related, healthcare system-related, and socioeconomic factors were represented to various extents depending on the patient group. By systematically examining how the WHO's five dimensions of medication adherence were applied differently across the eight different patient groups, we present a conceptual model that can be adapted to summarize the common factors contributing to medication adherence in different patient groups. CONCLUSION: Our conceptual models can be utilized as a guide for clinicians and researchers in identifying the facilitators and barriers to medication adherence and developing future interventions to improve medication adherence. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020181316.

Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. METHODS: A two-round Delphi survey was completed by an expert panel consisting of program directors, associate designated institutional officials, and designated institutional official (n = 15) from residency programs in Singapore. Round 1 comprised of 23 items from the P-MEX rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Definitely include, 2 = Possibly include, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Possibly exclude, 5 = Definitely exclude). In round 2, the experts received feedback from the previous round, and were asked to re-rate the items which did not achieve consensus in the previous round. The threshold for consensus in the study was defined as 70% or greater agreement among experts. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires for both rounds were received from all 15 experts. In round 1, 18 items (78%) achieved consensus to be included. In round 2, 1 (4%) item achieved consensus to be included. However, none of the remaining items achieved consensus to be removed, and they exhibited stability in responses. A list of 19 items covering four domains of medical professionalism (Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills) was obtained during the two-rounds of Delphi survey. CONCLUSIONS: Nineteen items in the P-MEX had garnered consensus and is suitable for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. The findings of this study can provide guidance for faculty and institutions who want to assess medical professionalism of their medical trainees.

Assessment of medical professionalism: preliminary results of a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The importance of medical professionalism has been well documented in the literature. Cultural background affects the constituents of professionalism. However, few studies have explored the domains of medical professionalism in an Asian context. We aim to describe the views and experiences of both patients and faculty on medical professionalism in an urban Asian city state. METHODS: Data for this qualitative study were collected through focus group discussions (FGDs) with patients and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with faculty members. The IDIs and FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted by two independent coders using a priori framework derived from Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX). Sociodemographic data of faculty members and patients were obtained through brief questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (58.1% male, all had visited healthcare facilities within the past year) and 26 faculty members (42.3% male, 38.5% from medical disciplines, median years as faculty is 11) participated in this study. The results supported the four domains of medical professionalism - Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills. Two new sub-domains which emerged from data were (1) communicated effectively with patient and (2) demonstrated collegiality. CONCLUSIONS: The domains of professionalism in Singapore were similar to previous studies. This study allows a better understanding of medical professionalism to enhance the assessment and ultimately, the teaching of medical professionalism in an urban multi-ethnic Asian city.

The direct and indirect costs of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic annual direct and indirect costs of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore, and to identify factors associated with these costs. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional, Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted. A questionnaire was administered to the patients between 2013 and 2016 from the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) spondyloarthritis registry. Direct medical costs and indirect costs were estimated using the SGH database and the human capital approach respectively. Multivariate analyses using generalized linear model with gamma distribution and a log-linked function was conducted to identify factors associated with these total, direct and indirect costs. All costs were adjusted to 2017 using the Singapore Consumer Price Index and converted to 2017 US dollars (USD) by purchasing power parity. RESULTS: A total of 135 consecutive patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 40.4 ± 13.2 years. The overall annual total economic cost to society was around USD 74 790 820, with annual direct cost being the main component of total cost (90.8%). Annual direct cost was around USD 67 931 457, while annual indirect cost was around USD 6 855 951. Presence of extra-spinal symptoms (ever) was associated with an increase in total and direct costs. Higher education level and Patient Global Assessment were associated with an increase in indirect costs. Lack of employment was associated with a decrease in indirect costs. CONCLUSION: The disease burden of axSpA in Singapore is not trivial given that the disease is relatively common. This highlights the need for measures to accommodate patients with axSpA economically in Singapore.

Validity and reliability of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore.

INTRODUCTION: The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) are commonly used instruments for measuring disease activity. However, few studies have assessed their psychometric properties in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI in patients with axSpA in Singapore. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 280 patients with axSpA from a dedicated axSpA clinic in a Singapore tertiary referral hospital from 2011 to 2019 were used. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed through 12 a priori hypotheses by correlation of overall ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI score with other patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs). Structural validity was evaluated via confirmatory factor analysis using maximum-likelihood method, where Comparative Fit Index (CFI) >0.95, Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) >0.95, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) <0.06 and Standardized Root Mean Residuals (SRMR) <0.08 were indicative of good fit. RESULTS: Among 280 patients (78.2% Male; 92.5% Chinese), ASDAS-CRP showed poor internal consistency of 0.33, while BASDAI showed high internal consistency of 0.87. Convergent and divergent construct validity were demonstrated by fulfillment of 11 out of 12 a priori hypotheses when ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI were compared with other PROMs. Our proposed ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI model showed good fit for a 1-factor structure respectively (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.036, SRMR = 0.026 for ASDAS-CRP; CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.985, RMSEA = 0.057, SRMR = 0.022 for BASDAI), demonstrating structural validity. CONCLUSION: This study supports the use of both ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI in measuring disease activity in patients with axSpA in Singapore.

Validity and reliability of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index in English-speaking patients with axial spondyloarthritis in Singapore.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the validity and reliability of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI) among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Singapore. METHODS: We collected data from English-speaking patients with axSpA seen at a dedicated axSpA clinic in a Singapore tertiary referral hospital from 2017 to 2018. Face validity of the English version of ASAS HI was assessed through cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs). Structural validity was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent construct validity was assessed with 12 a priori hypotheses about the magnitude and direction of correlations between the ASAS HI summary score and other patient-reported outcome measures. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Measurement error was assessed by analyzing smallest detectable change (SDC). RESULTS: Ten patients (age range 22-46 years, 50% male) participated in CDIs and face validity was supported. Among 108 patients (median age: 37 [21-77], 80.6% males), unidimensionality was confirmed (comparative fit index = 0.960, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.952, root mean square error of approximation = 0.038, standardized root mean residuals = 0.068, model Chi-square test P = 0.1251) in the 17-item ASAS HI. The ASAS HI showed good internal consistency of 0.83 and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.98) when baseline was compared with week 2. SDC was 1.02. Convergent validity was supported as hypotheses were confirmed in 100% of the results. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the ASAS HI as a valid and reliable measure of health status for use in patients with axSpA in Singapore.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) collaborative care for patients with axial spondyloarthritis (AcuSpA): protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) is a chronic disease which results in fatigue, pain, and reduced quality of life (QoL). Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), especially acupuncture, has shown promise in managing pain. Although a TCM collaborative model of care (TCMCMC) has been studied in cancer, there are no randomized controlled trials investigating TCM in AxSpA. Therefore, we will conduct a pragmatic trial to determine the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of TCMCMC for patients with AxSpA. We define TCMCMC as standard TCM history taking and physical examination, acupuncture, and TCM non-pharmacological advice and communications with rheumatologists in addition to usual rheumatologic care. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale for and methodology of this trial. METHODS/DESIGN: This pragmatic randomized controlled trial will recruit 160 patients who are diagnosed with AxSpA and have inadequate response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Simple randomization to usual rheumatologic care or the intervention (TCMCMC) with a 1:1 allocation ratio will be used. Ten 30-min acupuncture sessions will be provided to patients assigned to the TCMCMC arm. All participants will continue to receive usual rheumatologic care. The primary endpoint - spinal pain - will be evaluated at week 6. Secondary endpoints include clinical, quality of life, and economic outcome measures. Patients will be followed up for up to 52 weeks, and adverse events will be documented. DISCUSSION: This trial may provide evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a TCMCMC for patients with AxSpA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03420404 . Registered on 14 February 2018.

A qualitative study of quality of life domains and subdomains relevant to patients with spondyloarthritis.

AIMS: To identify quality of life (QoL) domains and subdomains relevant to patients with different spondyloarthritis (SpA) subtypes in Singapore, and to assess how identified QoL domains and subdomains map onto currently used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Nine focus group discussions (FGDs), including two previously conducted FGDs from the Updating the Psoriatic Arthritis Core Domain Set Study, were conducted with patients with SpA in Singapore. The FGDs were organized by SpA subtype and language spoken. All FGDs were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim. After thematic analysis through open and axial coding, the domains were organized using the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) framework. Identified QoL domains and subdomains were mapped to currently used PROMs. RESULTS: The nine FGDs included 51 patients. In total, 27 domains and 92 subdomains were identified and then organized within the 7 broad categories of the WHOQOL framework. Patients in Singapore were more concerned about "financial resources, " "work satisfaction" and "positive feelings" while less concerned about "freedom, physical safety and security" than patients in Western countries. "Home environment" and "work satisfaction" emerged as unique QoL domains relevant to patients with axial SpA (axSpA). PROMs for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) can capture both identified domains of PsA and axSpA. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of QoL domains and subdomains are relevant to SpA patients in Singapore, and there appears to be minimal differences in their relative importance between SpA subtypes. This study supports the development and validation of common QoL-specific PROMs for usage in SpA.

A cross-sectional study on factors associated with patient-physician discordance in global assessment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis: an Asian perspective.

AIM: To identify the factors associated with patient-physician discordance in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in an Asian population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in two tertiary referral centers in Singapore. Patients with axSpA who fulfilled Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group 2009 criteria for axSpA were included in the study. Socio-demographics, clinical, laboratory and patient-reported outcomes data were collected during study visits from 2014 to 2015. We performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate the factors associated with patient-physician discordance, which we defined as the difference between Patient Global Assessment and Physician Global Assessment. RESULTS: Included in the study were 298 axSpA patients: 82% male, 81% Chinese, median age 40 (20-78) years, median disease duration 9 (0.1-48) years. 80% were on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and 23% on biologics. In univariate analysis, current age (ß: 0.18, ρ = 0.06), duration of disease (ß: 0.34, ρ = 0.03), post-secondary education level (ß: -10.82, ρ = 0.03), global pain score (ß: 0.33, ρ < 0.01), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (ß: 2.80, ρ < 0.01), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score C-reactive protein (ß: 4.63, ρ < 0.01) and current use of biologics (ß: 10.97, ρ < 0.01) were associated with patient-physician discordance. In multivariate analysis, global pain score (ß: 0.32, ρ < 0.01), post-secondary education level (ß: -12.80, ρ = 0.01) and current biologics use (ß: 16.21, ρ < 0.01) were associated with patient-physician discordance. CONCLUSION: Higher global pain score, lower educational level and current biologics use were associated with greater patient-physician discordance. These factors should be considered during shared decision making.